Skip to content
Preview build Static rebuild in progress — the canonical site remains at ride.i-d-e.de.
RIDE A Review Journal for Scholarly Digital Editions and Resources

Charts

Each RIDE review answers a structured questionnaire of yes/no criteria, drawn from one of the IDE Criteria for Reviewing documents. The bar charts below show, per criteria set and per top-level section, the share of answers that were yes across the corpus. The denominator excludes the rare value="3" anomaly (one review uses it to mark “not in scope”); the count of excluded answers is reported below each chart.

The raw answers are also available as machine-readable JSON in the full corpus dump under questionnaires per review, and the underlying TEI lives in the GitHub mirror.

Criteria for Reviewing Digital Editions (1.1) — 76 reviews
Criteria for Reviewing Digital Editions (1.1) — yes-rate per top-level section across 76 reviews0%25%50%75%100%Documentation1001 / 2002 (50%)Contents1278 / 3850 (33%)Access modes768 / 2156 (36%)Aims and methods731 / 2541 (29%)Technical accessability615 / 2541 (24%)
Criteria for Reviewing Tools and Environments (1.0) — 15 reviews
Criteria for Reviewing Tools and Environments (1.0) — yes-rate per top-level section across 15 reviews0%25%50%75%100%General information85 / 221 (38%)Methods and implementation239 / 714 (33%)Documentation and support206 / 799 (26%)Usability and sustainability257 / 918 (28%)Analysability, extensibility, reusability of the code102 / 306 (33%)User interaction, GUI and visualization172 / 357 (48%)
Criteria for Reviewing Text Collections (1.0) — 20 reviews
Criteria for Reviewing Text Collections (1.0) — yes-rate per top-level section across 20 reviews0%25%50%75%100%general_information52 / 60 (87%)aims137 / 460 (30%)content180 / 800 (22%)composition195 / 656 (30%)data_modelling194 / 860 (23%)provision47 / 160 (29%)user_interface105 / 212 (50%)preservation110 / 417 (26%)

7 answers carried value="3" and were excluded from the percentage (anomaly per data.md).

Last updated: 2026-04-29