Skip to content
Preview build Static rebuild in progress — the canonical site remains at ride.i-d-e.de.
RIDE A Review Journal for Scholarly Digital Editions and Resources

Issue 19: Tools and Environments rolling issue

Edited by Roman Bleier and Stefan Dumont. 2024-12 – present (rolling release). DOI: 10.18716/ride.a.19.

3 reviews in this issue.

TEI Publisher

TEI Publisher. The Instant Publishing Toolbox https://teipublisher.com (Last Accessed: 2024-10-14). Reviewed by Nadine Sutor (University of Wuppertal) and Andreas Mertgens (University of Wuppertal).

The TEI Publisher is an open-source tool designed to simplify the publication of TEI encoded texts for researchers without extensive programming knowledge. It allows users to transform XML data into web-based digital editions using predefined templates and custom styles. Developed by eXist-Solutions, it integrates with the eXist-db XML database to store and…

Untangling Data Complexity: Custom Oxygen Frameworks for Edition Projects

Custom Oxygen Frameworks https://www.oxygenxml.com/doc/versions/26.0/ug-editor/topics/authoring_customization.html (Last Accessed: 2024-01-31). Reviewed by Jennifer Bunselmeier (University of Wuppertal) and Sina Krottmaier (University of Graz).

Consistency and coherence in annotated and enriched data are vital to the success of any digital edition project. Custom frameworks within the oXygen XML Editor provide a user-friendly approach for editors to interact directly with XML data, thus lowering entry barriers and ensuring consistency across datasets. Drawing on our experiences as customisers…

ChatGPT as an Assistant for Digital Scholarly Editing

ChatGPT https://openai.com/ (Last Accessed: 2026-02-01). Reviewed by Martina Scholger (University of Graz) and Roman Bleier (University of Graz).

Large language models such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT have rapidly become prominent tools in academic contexts, including digital scholarly editing. Although not originally designed for editorial practice, they are increasingly integrated into experimental editorial workflows. This review assesses its potential to support key editorial tasks and surveys recent…

← All issues